Juho Min's trial, is it proven to be 'secretly recorded'...10 months i…

kfrjk 0 1
(Expoz News reporter Oh Seung-hyun) accused of abusing webtoon writer Joo Ho-min's sonThe prosecution demanded an October prison term for special school teacher A.On the 15th, at the Suwon District Court Criminal Chamber 9 (judge Kwak Yong-heon)Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Child Abuse Crimes (Increased Punishment of Child Abuse by Workers in Child Welfare Facilities, etc.)A final trial was conducted on special teacher A accused of charges.On this day, the prosecution said to the accusedHe demanded a sentence of 10 months in prison, an order to complete, and a three-year employment limit. in the proceedingsThe file about the secret recording of A and Jo Ho Min's sonJudgment on whether it was illegal or not became an issue.Earlier on the 11th, the first part of the Supreme Court (Chief Justice Oh Kyung-mi)The Supreme Court) fined an elementary school teacher B 5 million won for violating the Child Abuse Punishment ActThe case was returned to the Seoul Eastern District Court in violation of the original ruling.Mr. B, since March 2018I don't go to school until May to the 3rd grade of elementary school I'm in charge ofHe is emotionally accused of abuse 16 times by expressing himself as if he were a child.Mr. BThe investigation found that the mother of the child suspected of child abuse by the teacher secretly hid in the child's bagIt started as evidence of recording the contents of the class with a recorder.According to the Communications Secret Protection Act, it will be releasedYou cannot record or listen to 'talks between others' using electronic devices,It's stipulated that it can't be used as evidence, but for the caseThe court of first and second instance recognized the evidence capability of the recorded file.But the Supreme Court said that the parents of the victimsThe defendant's secretly recorded remarks during class were made in an "unreleased conversation."The recording file is denied its ability to testify under the Communications Secret Protection Act, it said.The ruling was made by Jo Ho MinIt also affected his son's trial.The prosecution said that the difference between the previous case and the case isThere is, and in the case of children with severe autism, there is no other means other than recordingI insisted.However, A's lawyer said that the only evidence supporting the prosecution's indictment was the recorded fileHe emphasized that the ability to prove should be denied.In his final statement, Mr. A said, "With this rulingTo give hope to teachers who are still in trouble due to similar thingsHe asked for his innocence. So, Jo Ho-min didn't apologize to the victim until the endHe expressed some regret that he only pleaded not guilty.On the other hand, Jo Ho Min's autistic sonHe reported A on charges of child abuse, saying he refused to go to school expressing anxiety since September 2022.In the process, Jooho Min secretly put the recorder in his son's bagIt became known and controversial. When the news of the report became public, teachers' petition for leniency toward A was madeAnd a parent petition followed, and the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education passed A, who had been dismissed from his positionI reinstated him in August. The sentencing hearing will take place on the morning of February 1.Photo = X-Sports News DB
0 Comments
카테고리